The controversy is the latest example of how doctors and medical organizations are fighting insurers' efforts to implement "prior authorizations," which require an insurer's consent before they agree to pay for certain prescriptions, medical services or treatments. I can't take (time) off and go to the emergency room just to get a scope so my doctor can see if I need to be on a certain type of medication to help me through my flare.”ĭoctors specializing in digestive issues are writing letters, pressuring executives and posting on social media in a campaign to halt the new policy being implemented by UnitedHealthcare, one of the nation’s largest health insurers. “If I have to wait one, two or three weeks, that can land me in the hospital and the emergency room and that’s costly to me,” said Harrison, who works as a nurse at Baltimore-area hospital. Beginning June 1, her health insurer, UnitedHealthcare, will require doctors and patients to get authorization before common procedures including some colonoscopies and scopes of the throat, stomach and digestive tract. Then the installer of the target application would proceed ahead.LaTesha Harrison needs one or two scopes of her digestive system every year so her doctor can track her complications from Crohn’s disease.īut the suburban Baltimore woman worries these necessary procedures will soon be delayed, even when she feels bloated, aches or can't eat. A possible solution I am thinking of now is to run the other application's installer in the background - using an ampersand (&) as a final program argument and then somehow waiting for the other application to start, so that to close it. Let's consider that the other application's installer cannot be fixed and this should be handled in the installer of the current application. The UX of the other installer is even worse, since if it is ran in a normal mode with user interaction enabled there is no option - a checkbox, to allow/disallow the automatic run of the installed other application. The best solution for sure is to fix the other application's installer, so that not to start the other application automatically. Closing the started other application manually makes the installer of the target application to continue the installation progress. I am running a licensed professional version of BitRock InstallBuilder 17.4.0 ().Īny suggestions why the other BitRock InstallBuilder made installer could be stalling?Īn important fact that I've noticed is, which is probably an incorrect behavior of the other application's installer, is that it is automatically started after being installed and probably the element considers the automatic start of the other application as a prolongation of its installer. Tried dumping the $ but it was surprisingly empty - it should contain some number. WAIT other-app-installer.exe -mode unattended -unattendedmodeui minimalWithDialogsīut this time the installer of the target application throws an unspecified error. Installing another BitRock InstallBuilder made installer . Runs the application provided as an argument in blocked mode and one can proceed working with the console as soon as the other application's installer exits/finishes. Start /WAIT other-app-installer.exe -mode unattended -unattendedmodeui minimalWithDialogs The other application's installer exits correctly when being ran from the command-line with the command: The main application's installer still stalls - the installer is repsponding but does not proceed ahead with the rest of the installation steps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |